Larry Summers Resigns OpenAI Board Amid Epstein Scandal: Former U.S. Treasury Secretary and ex-Harvard President Lawrence “Larry” Summers has stepped down from OpenAI’s board of directors in the wake of explosive revelations about his correspondence with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein . OpenAI – the company behind AI models like ChatGPT – confirmed Summers’ resignation on Wednesday, with Summers citing a need to “step away from [his] public commitments” . This development comes as newly released Epstein emails drag one of America’s elite economists into an AI industry scandal, raising urgent questions about tech company board oversight, reputational risk, and the entanglement of elite networks with the governance of artificial intelligence.
Why It Matters: OpenAI is at the forefront of the AI revolution, so its leadership carries immense influence. Summers’ abrupt exit under scandalous circumstances represents an “AI governance crisis” in real time – one that intertwines the worlds of cutting-edge tech and long-standing power networks. The incident has ignited debates on OpenAI’s credibility, transparency in the AI sector, and how Epstein’s elite network of associates continues to cause upheaval years after his death. In short, this is more than a gossipy headline – it’s a cautionary tale about AI industry transparency amid an elite scandal, and a moment that could shape how AI companies vet and oversee their leaders.
Background: Summers, OpenAI, and Epstein’s Shadow
Who is Larry Summers? Summers is a high-profile economist and policymaker who served as Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton and later as a top economic advisor to Barack Obama . He was president of Harvard University from 2001–2006 (resigning after controversies including remarks about women in science) . Summers has since been a prominent public intellectual, teaching at Harvard and advising finance and tech firms. In November 2023, Summers joined OpenAI’s board as part of a new three-person interim board installed during OpenAI’s leadership turmoil . His appointment – alongside ex-Salesforce CEO Bret Taylor and Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo – followed the brief ouster and return of CEO Sam Altman . Summers was seen as bringing gravitas and a vast network to OpenAI, though some critics already flagged his controversial past and ties to Epstein as red flags .
What is OpenAI? OpenAI is the San Francisco-based artificial intelligence lab behind ChatGPT and GPT-4, at the center of today’s AI boom. Founded as a nonprofit-turned-capped-profit, OpenAI’s mission is to ensure AI benefits humanity – a mission that demands trust and ethical leadership. Its board of directors plays a crucial role in AI governance, overseeing strategies for safe AI development. Summers’ inclusion on the board connected the company to a veteran of government and academia. However, it also quietly connected OpenAI’s leadership to Epstein’s orbit – a connection now thrust into the spotlight.
Who is Jeffrey Epstein? Epstein was a wealthy financier convicted in 2008 for sex crimes involving a minor, and later charged with federal sex trafficking in 2019 . He moved in elite circles of business, science, academia, and politics until his apparent suicide in jail in August 2019. Epstein cultivated many prominent figures (from Bill Clinton and Donald Trump to British royalty ) and donated millions to institutions like Harvard. Summers’ relationship with Epstein dates back years: Epstein donated ~$9 million to Harvard between 1998 and 2008 (some of it during Summers’ presidency), and Summers reportedly met Epstein more than a dozen times and even flew on Epstein’s private jet on multiple occasions . Epstein was a “longtime associate” whom Summers continued communicating with until literally the day before Epstein’s 2019 arrest . Those ties, long whispered about, are now documented in embarrassing detail.
Timeline: Epstein Email Release Triggers Summers’ Ouster
Epstein Files Dumped: The scandal accelerated last week when a House Oversight Committee panel publicly released a trove of Epstein’s files – nearly 23,000 documents from Epstein’s estate – including years of emails and text messages between Epstein and Summers. This document dump on November 15, 2025, offered an unprecedented window into Epstein’s communications with powerful individuals. Summers featured prominently in the files, with hundreds of messages spanning 2013 through mid-2019 showing a surprisingly close rapport . These revelations landed like a bombshell in Cambridge and Silicon Valley alike.
Shocking Email Revelations: The Summers-Epstein emails, many from 2017–2019, show Summers corresponding with Epstein on personal and professional matters well after Epstein’s first conviction . In one 2018 exchange, Summers – who has been married since 2005 – sought Epstein’s advice about pursuing a romantic relationship with a much younger woman he described as a “mentee.” Summers confided his intimate feelings and dilemmas to Epstein, who eagerly played the role of dating coach and self-described “wing man” . Epstein replied to Summers within minutes at times, helping him “workshop” messages to the woman and strategize how to win her over . In a November 2018 text, Epstein even explicitly called himself Summers’ “wing man” as he dispensed courtship tips .
Other messages reveal the two men joking crassly about the situation. By mid-2019, Epstein and Summers were quipping about the odds of Summers ending up in bed with the woman, whom they referred to by the code name “peril.” Epstein joked that the probability of Summers sleeping with “peril” was “0,” but reassured him that “she is never ever going to find another Larry Summers” . (Notably, some observers found the nickname “peril” disturbing – pointing out it evokes the racist “yellow peril” trope, as the woman in question is of Asian descent . The woman is believed to be Keyu Jin, a Harvard-educated Chinese economist then in her 30s – though the emails never mention her by name.)
Beyond relationship gossip, the emails show Summers sharing professional correspondence with Epstein as well. He forwarded the young economist’s emails and draft papers to Epstein, who derided her as “needy :)” and encouraged Summers to play “the long game” in his interactions with her . In another exchange, Summers fretted that the woman might only be sticking around for his professional connections, to which Epstein responded, “She is doomed to be with you” .
The cache also contains instances of Summers making off-color remarks to Epstein. In one 2017 email, Summers revisited a controversial theme from his past, joking that he “observed that half the IQ in [the] world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51% of [the] population…” . This flippant aside about women’s intelligence harked back to the infamous comments on women in science that cost Summers the Harvard presidency in 2006 . It is jaw-dropping that even after that career fallout, Summers felt comfortable making similar quips to Epstein privately.
Bipartisan Backlash Builds: These revelations sparked swift, bipartisan backlash. Lawmakers across the political spectrum demanded accountability. According to Axios, both Republicans and Democrats urged institutions to cut ties with Summers after seeing the Epstein emails . Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), a longtime critic of Summers, publicly called on Harvard to sever its relationship with him . Warren blasted Summers’ “monumentally bad judgment” in remaining close to Epstein and argued he “cannot be trusted to advise…or teach a generation of students” given his choices . Even Donald Trump, now President again in 2025, seized on the issue – reportedly ordering the Justice Department to investigate Epstein’s ties with Summers and other prominent Democrats . (Trump last week also supported Congress’s near-unanimous vote to force release of more Epstein files, amid public suspicion of cover-ups .)
Facing growing fury, Summers quickly went into damage-control mode. On Monday, November 17, he issued a statement of contrition to media outlets and Harvard’s student paper. “I am deeply ashamed of my actions and recognize the pain they have caused,” Summers wrote, adding, “I take full responsibility for my misguided decision to continue communicating with Mr. Epstein.” He acknowledged the harm to those close to him and signaled that changes were coming.
Summers Steps Back (But Not Entirely): In that Monday statement, Summers announced he would “step back from public life” – withdrawing from all public commitments and roles – in order to “rebuild trust and repair relationships with the people closest to me.” However, he made clear he would continue his teaching and academic duties at Harvard . “I think it’s very important to fulfill my teaching obligations,” Summers told a class of students, addressing the issue in a TikTok video the next day . In practice, “stepping back” meant rapidly shedding the prestigious external positions that Summers had accumulated in recent years – unwinding his presence in the elite networks Epstein had once helped him navigate.
Over the next 48 hours, Summers began resigning from or being removed from a string of high-profile roles:
- Bloomberg: Summers had been a paid Bloomberg News columnist, but a Bloomberg spokesperson indicated his contributions would cease . By Tuesday, a Bloomberg editor noted Summers was no longer a paid contributor to Bloomberg TV .
- The New York Times: Summers had a one-year contract as a contributing opinion writer (started January 2025), which the Times decided not to renew after this scandal. A NYT spokesperson confirmed they will part ways with Summers at year’s end .
- Center for American Progress (CAP): The liberal think tank announced Summers ended his fellowship effective immediately . Summers had been a senior fellow at CAP since 2012, but on Monday CAP stated he’s stepping away from public commentary including his role at CAP .
- Yale University’s Hamilton Project / Budget Lab: Summers was an advisor to the Yale-affiliated Budget Lab (part of the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project). He stepped down from that position on Monday, with his profile swiftly scrubbed from the lab’s website .
- Peterson Institute for International Economics: Summers had affiliations with PIIE (a top economics think tank), which according to reports he has also exited .
- Other Roles: Reuters noted Summers also departed a role with the Brookings Institution’s Hamilton Project and possibly others in his vast portfolio . Essentially, if Summers was on a board or advisory council, he was likely out.
By Tuesday night (Nov 18), attention turned squarely to Summers’ primary institution: Harvard University. Summers is a tenured University Professor at Harvard and director of a Harvard Kennedy School center, so Harvard’s response was eagerly anticipated. That evening, Harvard’s spokesperson Jonathan Swain confirmed to The Harvard Crimson that Harvard would launch a new investigation into Summers’ Epstein ties . This probe, an extraordinary step, will revisit Harvard’s ties to Epstein by reviewing all Harvard affiliates named in the House’s Epstein documents . Not only will Summers be scrutinized, but also his wife Elisa New (a Harvard literature professor) and nearly a dozen other faculty and alumni who appeared in the files . Swain stated the university is evaluating the new information to determine “what actions may be warranted” . In other words, Harvard is signaling serious concern and a willingness to impose consequences if needed – up to and including cutting ties.
The Final Domino – OpenAI Board Resignation: By Wednesday morning (Nov 19), the situation culminated in Summers’ resignation from OpenAI’s board of directors – arguably his highest-profile corporate role. Both Summers and OpenAI confirmed his departure in statements to Axios . “In line with my announcement to step away from my public commitments, I have also decided to resign from the board of OpenAI,” Summers said, expressing gratitude for the chance to serve and optimism for the company’s future . OpenAI’s board, in turn, thanked him for his contributions and “the perspective he brought” during his tenure . This Larry Summers OpenAI board resignation came just two days after his pledge to retreat from public life , and almost exactly one year since he first joined OpenAI’s board in November 2023.
Importantly, Summers’ exit from OpenAI was voluntary (at least officially) and preemptive. OpenAI did not wait for a public campaign to force him out; he resigned as the wave of outrage crested. The company had no desire to become collateral damage in the Epstein fallout. With his resignation, OpenAI distances itself from the scandal – but not before earning the unwelcome label of an “OpenAI board scandal.”
Key Revelations: What the Epstein Emails Exposed
The newly released Epstein emails provide a rare, unfiltered glimpse into how a powerful academic engaged with a known predator, and they are frankly damning:
- “Extraordinarily Close” Relationship: Far from a casual acquaintance, Summers treated Epstein as a confidant. The House files span seven years of correspondence , indicating consistent contact from at least 2013 through mid-2019. Summers was still emailing Epstein in July 2019 – after a bombshell 2018 exposé in the Miami Herald had re-focused national attention on Epstein’s abuse of underage girls . This demonstrates stunningly poor judgment on Summers’ part, given Epstein’s notoriety.
- Personal Matters and “Wing Man” Advice: Summers trusted Epstein with deeply personal dilemmas, like how to handle a romantic/sexual pursuit outside his marriage . Epstein positioned himself as Summers’ coach in these matters, encouraging him to continue the chase. It’s clear in the messages that Summers placed an “extraordinary degree of trust” in Epstein – turning to him for guidance that mixed the personal and professional. For a former Harvard president to effectively say “please help me woo this woman” to Epstein is a striking revelation of the hold Epstein had in elite social circles.
- “Peril” and Potential Prejudice: The codename “peril” used for the woman adds a disturbing dimension. The Daily Beast pointed out that “peril” echoes the term “yellow peril,” a historic racist trope against Asians . If Epstein or Summers indeed chose that nickname as a crude joke about the woman’s Chinese ethnicity, it reveals a disdainful, locker-room tone in their exchanges. Even if unintended, it underscores how two powerful men discussed a younger woman in objectifying and cavalier terms – hardly behavior befitting an educator and public figure.
- Forwarding Private Emails: Summers forwarded the woman’s academic emails and drafts to Epstein for feedback . This is a breach of trust toward the mentee, who likely never imagined her messages were being shared with Epstein. It shows Summers treating Epstein as a behind-the-scenes adviser on even routine matters, raising questions about Summers’ boundaries and ethics.
- Epstein’s Influence at Harvard: The documents also confirm Epstein’s continued influence in Harvard circles beyond donations. In emails, Summers and Epstein discussed arranging campus visits for Epstein and funding for projects. Notably, Summers’ wife Elisa New corresponded at length with Epstein about her “Poetry in America” TV project, at one point seeking a $500,000 gift from him . She even acknowledged Epstein’s moral support, writing in 2015: “It really means a lot to me, all financial help aside, Jeffrey, that you are rooting for me and thinking about me.” . This suggests Epstein remained an active patron and cheerleader within Summers’ family and Harvard circle well after Harvard’s official cutoff of Epstein donations. (Harvard stopped accepting Epstein’s money in 2008, but clearly Epstein kept unofficially bankrolling projects via personal gifts .)
- No Illegal Conduct – But Ethical Lapses: It’s important to note that nothing in the emails indicates Summers engaged in or knew of Epstein’s crimes. As media have noted, there’s no evidence of illegal conduct by Summers . The scandal is about extremely poor judgment and boundary-blurring, not criminality. Summers himself stresses his “major error of judgment” in associating with Epstein . Nonetheless, these revelations are revolting to many because they show a powerful educator consorting with a known predator and trading in sexist banter, even as Epstein’s victims were seeking justice.
In sum, the emails pull back the curtain on how Epstein leveraged friendships with elite figures to maintain his social standing. For Summers, the correspondence is deeply embarrassing and at odds with the standards of any institution that had kept him in positions of trust.
Fallout and Implications for OpenAI’s Reputation
OpenAI’s Board Under Scrutiny: OpenAI now finds itself dealing with the reputation risk of having had an Epstein-linked figure in its top leadership. The OpenAI board scandal – coming on the heels of last year’s boardroom meltdown during the Altman episode – raises concerns about the stability and oversight of this influential AI company. AI governance experts are likely to ask how Summers was selected in the first place and whether the vetting process overlooked his known controversies (including prior reports of Epstein friendship) . OpenAI’s board was reconstituted in haste in 2023; in that urgent moment, did expedience trump due diligence? The company now has an opportunity (and pressure) to demonstrate that its board oversight is maturing – perhaps by appointing new board members with impeccable ethical track records or expertise in AI ethics and governance.
Loss of Expertise vs. Gain of Integrity: Summers’ departure deprives OpenAI’s board of a seasoned economist’s perspective. Supporters would argue he brought valuable policy experience and network connections to guide OpenAI in navigating global economics and regulation . However, given the circumstances, OpenAI likely gains more than it loses by parting ways. The taint of an Epstein association could erode trust among OpenAI’s users, partners, and regulators. By swiftly distancing itself, OpenAI can try to contain the damage. It sends a message that even perceived misconduct or integrity issues at the highest level won’t be tolerated – a message crucial for a company that asks the public to trust its AI with sensitive data and societal impact.
AI Industry “Governance Crisis”: More broadly, this episode feeds into a narrative that the tech industry – and the AI sector in particular – is fumbling with governance. If one of the world’s leading AI labs can have a board member resign in disgrace due to an unrelated moral scandal, it underscores how nascent and fragile governance structures in tech can be. Some commentators have already dubbed it an “AI governance crisis” of 2025, tying it to debates about how to hold AI companies accountable. The AI industry’s transparency (or lack thereof) is under the microscope. Incidents like this could spur calls for clearer ethical guidelines for AI company directors, or even regulatory oversight of AI firms’ leadership in the future. For example, policymakers might push for disclosure requirements about board members’ backgrounds, to ensure no “elite scandals” are lurking that could compromise an AI firm’s integrity.
Regulatory and Investor Reactions: OpenAI operates in a space where public trust and regulatory goodwill are essential. Already, governments are scrutinizing AI closely. An embarrassing scandal at OpenAI might invite tougher questions from regulators about the company’s internal controls and judgment. OpenAI’s competitors and partners will also take note – trust is a currency in AI development collaborations. Additionally, OpenAI’s major backer, Microsoft, surely wanted this matter resolved quickly; any hesitation to remove Summers could have alarmed investors or partners about OpenAI’s commitment to ethics. By acting swiftly, OpenAI likely reassures stakeholders, but it also highlights that boardroom issues remain a vulnerability. This could accelerate efforts (both at OpenAI and across the industry) to formalize AI company governance best practices.
Elite Networks, Harvard Fallout, and the Broader Conversation
Epstein’s Elite Web Ensnaring Tech: The Summers saga is a vivid reminder that elite networks of power are deeply intertwined across sectors – finance, academia, politics, and now tech. Jeffrey Epstein’s “elite network email release” has now toppled a figure in the AI world, demonstrating that no realm is insulated from broader accountability. The scandal invites reflection on how someone like Epstein managed to ingratiate himself with so many influential people. It raises uncomfortable questions: Did Epstein’s money and connections buy him undue influence over decision-makers who should have known better? In Summers’ case, Epstein’s advice and funds clearly seeped into academic and personal decisions. The risk is that similar hidden entanglements could exist elsewhere in tech leadership, potentially clouding judgment. This fuels the argument that transparency is needed not just in AI algorithms, but in the backgrounds and relationships of AI’s leaders.
Harvard’s Reckoning Continues: For Harvard University, where Summers remains a prominent professor, this is another chapter in a long-running Epstein reckoning. Harvard already conducted a review in 2020 of its institutional ties to Epstein, concluding that the university accepted millions from him (and even made Epstein an honorary visiting fellow in 2005) before belatedly cutting him off . Now, with Summers and other Harvard affiliates implicated in newly released documents, Harvard is essentially being forced to reopen the Epstein case. The new probe will examine whether individuals violated university policies or ethics by continuing relationships with Epstein after his crimes were known . Students and faculty are voicing anger – a Crimson campus report quoted undergraduates demanding Summers resign from his faculty post, saying his behavior is antithetical to Harvard’s values . Harvard must decide if Summers can continue teaching while under investigation, and whether any disciplinary action (from censure up to dismissal) is warranted. This is significant beyond one man – it speaks to institutional accountability. If an elite university can hold a star professor accountable for associating with a sexual predator, it sets an example that prestige does not immunize one from consequences.
Ethics in Tech Leadership: Summers’ downfall also feeds into the ongoing discussion about ethics in tech leadership. In recent years, big tech companies and AI firms have faced criticism for leadership choices – e.g. including board members or advisors with dubious ethical track records. (Summers himself was a contentious choice for OpenAI’s board; advocacy groups argued it signaled OpenAI was “unserious about the interests of humanity” given Summers’ past. That critique seems prescient now.) This episode may encourage tech companies to think harder about who sits on their boards. Diversity, integrity, and freedom from conflicts or scandalous entanglements may get heavier weight. For OpenAI, replacing Summers might be an opportunity to bring in a new voice perhaps with expertise in AI ethics, governance, or public interest – signaling a reset.
Transparency and Public Trust: In the end, this saga underlines a core principle: transparency is crucial to public trust, whether in universities or AI companies. It was the transparency provided by a House Oversight data dump that brought hidden emails to light – and only then did institutions act. Moving forward, stakeholders may demand more proactive transparency. AI companies like OpenAI might be encouraged to disclose more about their leadership and decision-making processes to assure the public that the people steering AI’s future are worthy of the immense responsibility. There are calls already for tech leaders to be more open about who advises them and how they make ethical choices. OpenAI, given its mission to benefit humanity, might even take this moment to lead by example – perhaps instituting stronger ethics guidelines for board members, regular conflict-of-interest audits, or publishing reports on governance.
Conclusion
Larry Summers’ resignation from OpenAI’s board amid the Epstein emails scandal is a watershed moment at the intersection of AI governance and elite accountability. It demonstrates how the sins of powerful networks can reverberate in unexpected arenas – even a cutting-edge AI lab. In a span of days, we saw a renowned economist humbled, an AI company’s board rocked, a top university re-examining its values, and bipartisan calls for transparency and justice. The incident serves as a cautionary tale: no matter how prominent or skilled the individual, associations with abhorrent behavior carry a steep price in the court of public opinion.
For OpenAI, the immediate crisis may be mitigated with Summers gone, but the challenge now is to rebuild trust. All eyes will be on who fills the board vacancy and how OpenAI assures the world that its leadership is beyond reproach. The AI industry in 2025 faces a credibility test – one that extends beyond just this case. Companies must recognize that ethical lapses or opaque dealings at the top can undermine public confidence in AI technologies themselves.
This story is still unfolding. Watch for the outcome of Harvard’s investigation – will Harvard impose consequences on Summers or others? How will Summers navigate his teaching career under this cloud? Additionally, the U.S. Justice Department may release further Epstein files and investigate those ties, potentially exposing more about how Epstein’s network functioned . Any new revelations could spark additional governance shake-ups in other institutions.
On the regulatory front, lawmakers are increasingly uniting (in a rare show of bipartisanship) to demand answers on Epstein’s connections – that momentum might carry over into greater scrutiny of elite networks and perhaps new laws on transparency for influential organizations.
In the coming weeks, OpenAI will likely quietly refocus on its AI research and products. But the lesson of Summers’ resignation will linger as a reminder that the integrity of those guiding AI is of paramount importance. In an era where AI systems are growing more powerful and entwined with society, the people at the helm must uphold the highest standards. When they fall short, as Larry Summers did, the repercussions can be swift – and far-reaching.
By confronting this scandal head-on, OpenAI and Harvard have a chance to show that no individual is above accountability. The hope is that this drives home the value of ethics and transparency in all halls of power, from the Ivy League to Silicon Valley. In the long run, a commitment to clean, responsible leadership will bolster public trust – something both higher education and the AI industry desperately need as they shape our collective future.
Sources
- Axios: “Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board amid Epstein revelations” – Axios report confirming Summers’ resignation and quotes from his and OpenAI’s statements .
- Business Insider: “Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI’s board over Epstein ties” – Insider piece with Summers’ statement of resignation and context on his stepping back from public life .
- Business Insider: “Larry Summers says he’s stepping away from public life after Epstein emails surface” – Detailed Insider report on Summers’ Monday statement of shame, the content of the emails (seeking advice on a mentee, sexist remarks), Elizabeth Warren’s reaction, and Summers’ roles at CAP, Bloomberg, OpenAI, etc. .
- The Harvard Crimson: “As Summers Sought Clandestine Relationship With Woman He Called a Mentee, Epstein Was His ‘Wing Man’” – In-depth Crimson article describing the 2018–2019 communications where Epstein advised Summers on a romantic pursuit, including “wing man” texts, code name “peril,” and Summers’ continued trust in Epstein .
- The Harvard Crimson: “Harvard To Launch New Investigation Into Epstein’s Ties to Summers, Other University Affiliates” – Crimson news piece (Nov. 19, 2025) confirming Harvard’s new probe into Summers and others, with quotes from Harvard’s spokesperson and details from the House Epstein documents (23,000 files, including Summers-Epstein messages about women and Harvard initiatives, plus Elisa New’s emails about funding) .
- The Harvard Crimson: “Summers To Step Back from Public Commitments Amid Epstein Scandal” – Crimson report (Nov. 17, 2025) on Summers’ announcement to withdraw from public roles. It details his apology (“deeply ashamed”), intent to keep teaching, and the immediate resignations from Yale Budget Lab, CAP, and non-renewal of his NYT contract .
- The Guardian: “Harvard investigates Larry Summers’ Epstein ties as he exits OpenAI board” – Guardian article noting Harvard’s investigation, Summers’ resignation from OpenAI, and that he’d also been let go by Bloomberg and the NYT. Includes context of the House document release and quotes from Summers’ Monday statement of stepping back .
- The Daily Beast: “Harvard’s Slutty Professor Finally Loses a Job Over Epstein Emails” – Daily Beast piece with a colorful take on Summers (“Epstein super fan”) resigning from OpenAI and facing a Harvard probe. It highlights the email contents (discussions about “peril,” the racist undertone, Epstein’s “wing man” role, and Summers joking about sex), and notes Summers’ “deeply ashamed” comment and intent to keep teaching .
- CBS News: “Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board and other roles after Epstein emails released” – CBS News report summarizing Summers’ resignation, his quote about stepping away, and listing other roles he left (Bloomberg, NYT, Brookings’ Hamilton Project, CAP, Peterson Institute, Yale lab). It also mentions no evidence of illegality by Summers and notes Congress voting to release Epstein files .
- Reuters: “Harvard launches probe into Larry Summers’ ties with Epstein, university newspaper reports” – Reuters piece referencing the Harvard Crimson report about the new Harvard investigation. It quotes Harvard’s statement on reviewing Epstein documents and notes Summers’ stepping back after President Trump ordered an investigation into Epstein’s ties with Summers and other Democrats . Also mentions the House Oversight release and that Harvard’s probe covers Summers’ wife and others.